Washington State taxes have NOT increased relative to the GDP

Republicans like to claim that Washington State taxes are too high. Especially on social media sites such as nextdoor.com, there are lots of posts comparing tax rates over the years and considering population growth and inflation. It’s a complex issue, and I don’t claim the analysis below is all-encompassing or the final word.

Using data provided by the St. Louis Federal Reserve, I made the graph below plotting Washington State tax revenue and Washington State’s GDP on the same graph.

What the graph shows is that, contrary to Republicans’ claims, Washington State tax revenues have not increased any more than GDP has.  Throughout this time period, state tax revenue has been about 4.4% of GDP.   The Pearson correlation coefficient between taxes and GDP is 0.99, and you can see from the graph below that the data lie almost along a straight line. (From about 2009 through about 2016, tax revenue lagged GDP by a bit — due to the Bush recession? — while from 2020 until 2024, tax revenues exceeded GDP by a bit.)

The source for the GDP data was:  https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WANGSP .

The source for the tax revenue data was:  https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WATOTLTAX .

This analysis supplements the argument made in the following useful essay but was developed independently: Washington State’s budget has been shrinking, not growing, despite statements to the contrary by former elected officials.  Quoting: “In 2005, when Gre­goire took office, expen­di­tures per $1,000 in per­son­al income were $189.98. And in 2023, which is now the most recent year for which data is avail­able, they were $170.25. That’s not growth. That’s shrink­age.”

"Washington

The csv file from which the above graph was generated is here: taxes-versus-GDP-WA-from-1997.csv.


By the way, according to a google search: Gross Domestic Product (GDP) includes some government spending. In the standard expenditure approach, GDP is calculated using the formula

$GDP = C + I + G + (X – M)$.

In this formula, the “G” represents government consumption expenditures and gross investment. This includes things like:
  • Salaries of public workers
  • National defense and military equipment
  • Infrastructure like new schools, highways, and bridges
What is excluded?

Only the government’s purchases of goods and services produced in the economy count toward GDP. A large portion of government spending goes toward transfer payments—such as Social Security, unemployment benefits, and veteran’s benefits. These are not counted in GDP because the government does not receive a new good or service in return for them; they are simply transfers of income.

How Medicare Enters the GDP Equation
The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) factors Medicare into GDP through the Expenditure Approach equation (GDP = C + I + G + NX). It does this by splitting the money into two categories:
  • Personal Consumption Expenditures (C): The vast majority of Medicare spending is classified as “Government Social Benefits to Persons.” When Medicare pays a private hospital or doctor for a beneficiary’s treatment, it is counted as a household consumer health expense.
  • Government Consumption (G): The smaller portion of Medicare funding used strictly to manage the program—such as administrative costs, processing fees, and running the federal offices—is counted directly as government spending.

You may also like...