What will it take for elected Democratic legislators in our state, and the governor, to refuse to accede to extortionists?
EXTORTION – excerpt from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
“The term extortion is often used metaphorically . . .Â Â Â It is also often used loosely to refer to everyday situations where one person feels indebted against their will, to another, in order to receive an essential service or AVOID LEGAL CONSEQUENCES . . . . .
“Neither extortion nor blackmail require a threat of a criminal act, such as violence, merely a threat used to ELICIT ACTIONS, money, or property from the object of the extortion.”
Unfortunately, a pattern of Democratic acquiescence has set in with the passage of Eyman’s I-1053.Â This is not the same as being willing to compromise, a necessary part of democratic governance.
We are at a financial impasse caused by the apparently tacit agreement among Democrats in our legislature not to challenge Eyman’s I-1053 voting restrictions on the legislature in matters of taxation. Presumably, this is due to fear of possible political fall-out at the next election.
Because I-1053 is unconstitutional on its face since it is in direct conflict with at least four articles of the Washington state constitution, its status must be determined by our state Supreme Court.
Until its constitutionality is settled,Â the legislature should proceed on the premise that it is not constitutional, especially in the area of ending or suspending selected corporate tax reductions.
This would enable the legislature to produce a budget for our educational needs that more closely resembles the needs of a modern state, instead of the Draconian lopping off of essential parts that the proposed budget now entails.
It changes nothing at all for the victims of current budget priorities if the Democratic enablers of Eyman’s I-1053 in our legislature are in pain and wish they could do otherwise.
What they must do is undertake a reassessment of whether or not to confront the extortionists head-on for the benefit of the people of our state.
Washington voters have repeatedly shown their support for education. With truthful, forthright explanation of why we must remove tax exemptionsÂ in order to restore funding for education in this exceptionally straitened economic context, the potential “political fall-out” could not only be avoided, but turned into a political victory.
How much courage does it take to do the right thing?
WSDCC State Committee Woman
President, May Arkwright Hutton Chapter, WSFDW