First, it needs to be said that we cannot let Trump win.
That being said, as an elected PLEO Delegate to the Democratic National Convention, I owe a report back to the people even as I continue to process the events of the past couple weeks, so I’m offering this partial post-DNC analysis/reflection/report back as Iâ€™m still processing the events I was privileged to witness. We need to go in with our eyes wide open as to what weâ€™re being asked to support and work for in this election cycle. The following is a tidbit of a longer message regarding Secâ€™y Clintonâ€™s VP pick Sen. Tim Kaine that was sent by the Bernie Campaign to his Democratic National Convention Delegates last week.
Known as a â€œcentristâ€ governor of Virginia, Kaine supported restrictions on abortion and angered environmentalists by fighting for a controversial coal-fired power plant in Wise County. He declared â€œI strongly supportâ€ Virginiaâ€™s anti-union â€œright-to-workâ€ law and denigrated critics of corporate-friendly trade deals as having a â€œloserâ€™s mentality.â€ He criticized Democrats in 2011 for seeking a higher tax rate on millionaires. In the U.S. Senate since 2013, he has consistently ranked as one of the least progressive Democrats and was one of only a dozen Democrats who supported Trans-Pacific Partnership Fast Track last year.
Instead of solidifying the power built by the peopleâ€™s movement to support Bernie Sanders into a unified Democratic base by choosing a progressive running partner, Clinton has chosen to throw the peopleâ€™s movement under the bus in favor of the possible chance of gaining some votes from disenchanted Republicans. Iâ€™m having trouble seeing the loyalty to our partyâ€™s platform by courting those who are opposed to it, and am afraid that sheâ€™s disrespected the movement and lost for the Democrats much more than we stand to gain.
So, Clinton and the DNCC are forcing us to support a Right-to-Work, anti-choice, anti-environmental, anti-tax on millionaires, pro-TPP Vice Presidential candidate and work for our own demise? Whereâ€™s the respect for working families, women, future generations, and the growing movement to fight for their issues? Asking workers to support a Right-to Work (actually itâ€™s Right-to-Work-for-Less) candidate is like asking displaced workers to train their outsourced replacements who will do their jobs for less pay.
Right-to-Work is all about breaking working peopleâ€™s power. What is our future if our power is taken from us? With the advent of union busting, the proliferation of Right-to-Work to 25 states now, and the diminishment of union density and working familiesâ€™ power to fight for our fair share of the wealth we create, income disparity has reached modern historical highs not seen since the 1920â€™s, when industrial unions started building real worker power and created the middle class.
There are similar analogies for women, environmentalists, tax fairness and fair trade proponents, i.e. asking women to support someone who wants to restrict choice, or environmentalists to support someone who wants to expand use of fossil fuels. It appears the policies that Kaine supports are all about advancing a corporate agenda. And, Iâ€™m reminded that Clintonâ€™s chief advisor (Bill) is also from a Right-to-Work state and started this whole free-trade fiasco that has cost so many American jobs, was a founder and leader of the conservative DLC, implemented so-called welfare reform that has crippled the most vulnerable families, and instituted conservative criminal justice reform that locked up so many disadvantaged and people of color into the prison-industrial complex and militarized our police forces.
Certainly, the platform contains some very good policy objectives that we all instinctively know need to be in it, but with no way to enforce the platform on electeds itâ€™s just a lot of good words. It all boils down to trust in Hillary. But, as a member of the Walmart Board of Directors, what did she do to support their low-wage workers? What effect will the millions of dollars she received from the many closed door speeches she gave to the Wall Street elite (at $300,000+ per speech) have on reforming our financial system with more than token efforts? Is the Debbie Wasserman Schultz fiasco indicative that Clinton uses political favors to repay political abuses, gain political power, and squelch the peopleâ€™s voice? Despite the good words in the platform, policy follows power and in this case, I fear it will follow the money and the conservatives she, Bill, the DNCC, and the DLC are catering to and dragging the Democratic party toward.
Wouldnâ€™t it have been better political strategy to embrace the peopleâ€™s movement rather than to power through an agenda that moves us to the right?
Many Trump followers are frustrated with the insecurity that the ongoing assault by corporations and power elite have imposed on their families, so theyâ€™ve gravitated to a demagogue who is saying what they want to hear regarding change, but is actually an embedded part of the problem.
The media will spin all this to make it easier for us to rationalize, but we’ll still know the truth. So, Clinton vs. Trump? Iâ€™m still processing, and healing from the top-down reaming at the DNC (Bernie Delegates were abused all week at the Convention, some physically), but I know Iâ€™ll make the best decision in the end that my conscience will allow.
Now, I have to re-read the first sentence of this articleÂ above. What a dilemma.