Austin K sent this link along in an email this morning. It’s a couple of years old, but it’s still worth sharing and reading. The links go to interesting websites if you have an open mind about politics, which is to say, that you can imagine political positions that are broader than the republican and democratic party talking points. I am only posting two of the points that Nate pulls from Tom’s article. If you want to see the third point, you are going to have click on the link.Â Fair use can look tyrannical.
Nate uses his What in the Hell …? website the way I use smallblueplanet.org, as a staging area to gather ideas, to store links and info, then to compose from that website for publication elsewhere. For me, that makes Nate’s What in the Hell… ? particularly interesting.
July 24, 2009
Hat tip to Tom Wetzel for this fine article. Check it out. Full disclosure and a little bragging, I know Tom, weâ€™re both involved in the Workers Solidarity Alliance, so Iâ€™m biased. Anyhow, read his piece.
My favorite three bits are quoted below. With these bits I was reading it and I was like â€œyeah, this is what I try to do in this kind
of work but I havenâ€™t put it this clearly before,â€ which is a cool feeling, like the article put clearly into words what had been more of a gut feeling for me or stuff Iâ€™d fumbled and put badly before.
1. â€œDual organizational anarchists often say that the role of the anarchist political organization is to â€œwin the battle of ideas,â€ that
is, to gain influence within movements and among the mass of the population by countering authoritarian or liberal or conservative ideas. Bakunin had said that the role of anarchist activists was a â€œleadership of ideas.â€
But disseminating ideas isnâ€™t the only form of influence. Working with others of diverse views in mass organizations and struggles, exhibiting a genuine commitment, and being a personable and supportive person in this context also builds personal connections, and makes it more likely oneâ€™s ideas will be taken seriously.â€
2. â€œmass struggles and mass organizing as the process for changing societyâ€¦because it is through the active participation of growing numbers of ordinary people, building and controlling their own movements, that they develop the capacity and aspirations for changing society.
From the point of view of â€œorganized anarchism with a class struggle perspective,â€ two kinds of organization are needed: (1) forms of mass organization through which ordinary people can grow and develop their collective strength, and (2) political organizations of the anarchist or libertarian socialist minority, to have a more effective means to coordinate our activities, gain influence in working class communities, and disseminate our ideas. In the World War 1 era Italian anarchists coined the term â€œdual organizationâ€ for this perspective.