My email buddy Austin Kelly gathers and distributes some really amazing stuff. Here’s something that I got from him today under Gender and Liberation:
Critique of Liberal Anti-Racism: A Way Forward or Regression on Race?
2009 DECEMBER 7
The following essay by Walter Benn Michaels appeared in the London Review of Books.
Here are some excerpts:
â€œMy point is not that anti-racism and anti-sexism are not good things. It is rather that they currently have nothing to do with left-wing politics, and that, insofar as they function as a substitute for it, can be a bad thing. American universities are exemplary here: they are less racist and sexist than they were 40 years ago and at the same time more elitist. The one serves as an alibi for the other: when you ask them for more equality, what they give you is more diversity. The neoliberal heart leaps up at the sound of glass ceilings shattering and at the sight of doctors, lawyers and professors of colour taking their place in the upper middle class. Whence the many corporations which pursue diversity almost as enthusiastically as they pursue profits, and proclaim over and over again not only that the two are compatible but that they have a causal connection â€“ that diversity is good for business. But a diversified elite is not made any the less elite by its diversity and, as a response to the demand for equality, far from being left-wing politics, it is right-wing politics.â€
â€œThus the primacy of anti-discrimination not only performs the economic function of making markets more efficient, it also performs the therapeutic function of making those of us who have benefited from those markets sleep better at night. And, perhaps more important, it has, â€˜for a long timeâ€™, as Wendy Bottero says in her contribution to the recent Runnymede Trust collection Who Cares about the White Working Class?, also performed the intellectual function of focusing social analysis on what she calls â€˜questions of racial or sexual identityâ€™ and on â€˜cultural differencesâ€™ instead of on â€˜the way in which capitalist economies create large numbers of low-wage, low-skill jobs with poor job securityâ€™. The message of Who Cares about the White Working Class?, however, is that class has re-emerged: â€˜What we learn hereâ€™, according to the collectionâ€™s editor, Kjartan PÃ¡ll Sveinsson, is that â€˜life chances for todayâ€™s children are overwhelmingly linked to parental income, occupations and educational qualifications â€“ in other words, class.â€™â€
Read the essay over at the London Review of Books.
Sex, Race and Class â€“ Selma James